AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe and NVIDIA Quadro K1200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 1058 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1124 MHz
- Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 57.6 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 896 vs 512
- Around 87% better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 1,151 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.281 vs 31.949
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.276 vs 466.139
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.951 vs 2.629
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.944 vs 25.411
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 196.307 vs 117.722
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5269 vs 4080
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2344 vs 1721
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3288
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5269 vs 4080
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2344 vs 1721
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3288
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 September 2016 vs 28 January 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 1058 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1124 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 57.6 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops vs 1,151 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 vs 31.949 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 vs 466.139 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 vs 2.629 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 vs 25.411 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 vs 117.722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 vs 4080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2344 vs 1721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3288 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 vs 4080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2344 vs 1721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3288 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200
- Around 78% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 80 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | NVIDIA Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 | 31.949 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 | 466.139 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 | 2.629 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 | 25.411 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 | 117.722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 | 4080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2344 | 1721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3288 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 | 4080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2344 | 1721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3288 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2952 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8820 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Baffin | GM107 |
| Launch date | 27 September 2016 | 28 January 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 796 | 798 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $321.97 | |
| Price now | $289.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.00 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | 1,151 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 57.6 GTexel / s | 35.97 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 160 mm | |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe with others
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1200
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
AMDRadeon RX 640
