NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs AMD FirePro W2100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K200M and AMD FirePro W2100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K200M

  • Around 35% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 630 MHz
  • 11.4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 400 Watt
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 630 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 400 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W2100

  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
  • Around 33% better floating-point performance: 435.2 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Pipelines 320 vs 192
Floating-point performance 435.2 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K200M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W2100

Name NVIDIA Quadro K200M AMD FirePro W2100
PassMark - G3D Mark 883
PassMark - G2D Mark 321
Geekbench - OpenCL 3715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.438
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 289.646
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.991
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 50.338
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2329
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2329
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1058

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K200M AMD FirePro W2100

Essentials

Architecture Kepler GCN 1.0
Code name GK107 Oland
Launch date 22 August 2014 12 August 2014
Place in performance rating not rated 1205
Type Workstation Workstation

Technical info

Core clock speed 850 MHz 630 MHz
Floating-point performance 326.4 gflops 435.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 192 320
Texture fill rate 13.6 GTexel / s 13.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 400 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 1,040 million
Boost clock speed 680 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DisplayPort
DisplayPort count 2
Dual-link DVI support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Form factor Low Profile / Half Length
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 12.8 GB / s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 n / a
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AppAcceleration
Powerplay

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K200M with others

NVIDIA Quadro K200M NVIDIA
Quadro K200M
vs AMD FirePro W2100 AMD
FirePro W2100
NVIDIA Quadro K200M NVIDIA
Quadro K200M
vs AMD FirePro W4100 AMD
FirePro W4100
NVIDIA Quadro K200M NVIDIA
Quadro K200M
vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE AMD
Radeon R7 250XE