NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs AMD FirePro W4100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K200M and AMD FirePro W4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K200M

  • Around 35% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 630 MHz
  • Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 630 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 50 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4100

  • Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 20.16 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
  • 2.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 192
  • Around 98% better floating-point performance: 645.1 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Texture fill rate 20.16 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 512 vs 192
Floating-point performance 645.1 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K200M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4100

Name NVIDIA Quadro K200M AMD FirePro W4100
PassMark - G3D Mark 1529
PassMark - G2D Mark 481
Geekbench - OpenCL 5516
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.65
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 538.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.63
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 31.533
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 75.309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3399
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1620
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3399
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1620

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K200M AMD FirePro W4100

Essentials

Architecture Kepler GCN 1.0
Code name GK107 Cape Verde
Launch date 22 August 2014 13 August 2014
Place in performance rating not rated 954
Type Workstation Workstation

Technical info

Core clock speed 850 MHz 630 MHz
Floating-point performance 326.4 gflops 645.1 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 192 512
Texture fill rate 13.6 GTexel / s 20.16 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 1,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort
Dual-link DVI support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Form factor Low Profile / Half Length
Length 171 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 12.8 GB / s 72 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 4000 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AppAcceleration
Powerplay

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K200M with others

NVIDIA Quadro K200M NVIDIA
Quadro K200M
vs AMD FirePro W2100 AMD
FirePro W2100
NVIDIA Quadro K200M NVIDIA
Quadro K200M
vs AMD FirePro W4100 AMD
FirePro W4100
NVIDIA Quadro K200M NVIDIA
Quadro K200M
vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE AMD
Radeon R7 250XE