NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs AMD FirePro W4100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K200M and AMD FirePro W4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K200M
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 630 MHz
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 630 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4100
- Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 20.16 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 192
- Around 98% better floating-point performance: 645.1 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
| Texture fill rate | 20.16 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 645.1 gflops vs 326.4 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K200M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4100
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K200M | AMD FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1504 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 453 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.65 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 538.848 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.631 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.533 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 75.309 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3399 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1620 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3399 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1620 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K200M | AMD FirePro W4100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | Cape Verde |
| Launch date | 22 August 2014 | 13 August 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 965 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 630 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 645.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 13.6 GTexel / s | 20.16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Low Profile / Half Length | |
| Length | 171 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Powerplay | ||