NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs ATI Radeon X1300 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200M and ATI Radeon X1300 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 667 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 11.1x more texture fill rate: 26.68 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 6.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 41.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3501 vs 84
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 367 vs 313
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 July 2014 vs 1 November 2006 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3501 vs 84 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 vs 313 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1300 PRO
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 65 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1300 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K2200M | ATI Radeon X1300 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3501 | 84 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 | 313 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10787 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4750 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4750 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3084 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3084 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M | ATI Radeon X1300 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | R500 |
Code name | GM107 | RV516 |
Launch date | 19 July 2014 | 1 November 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 549 | 550 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 GTexel / s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 31 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |