NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 667 MHz
Around 84% higher texture fill rate: 49.2 billion / sec vs 26.68 GTexel / s
Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,825 gflops vs 853.8 gflops
Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5347 vs 3501
Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 642 vs 367
Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16715 vs 10787
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6803 vs 4750
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3084
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6803 vs 4750
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3084

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	20 August 2015 vs 19 July 2014
Core clock speed	1024 MHz vs 667 MHz
Texture fill rate	49.2 billion / sec vs 26.68 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 640
Floating-point performance	1,825 gflops vs 853.8 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	5347 vs 3501
PassMark - G2D Mark	642 vs 367
Geekbench - OpenCL	16715 vs 10787
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6803 vs 4750
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 3084
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6803 vs 4750
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 3084

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 90 Watt
835.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3697
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3697

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt vs 90 Watt
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720 vs 3697
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720 vs 3697

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5347

3501

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

642

367

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

16715

10787

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6803

4750

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3697

3720

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3084

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6803

4750

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3697

3720

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3084

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950	NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
PassMark - G3D Mark	5347	3501
PassMark - G2D Mark	642	367
Geekbench - OpenCL	16715	10787
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	60.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	758.865
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	29.738
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	231.508
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6803	4750
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3697	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3084
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6803	4750
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3697	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3084
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	104

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950	NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Maxwell
Code name	GM206	GM107
Launch date	20 August 2015	19 July 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$159
Place in performance rating	553	556
Price now	$194.44
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	30.06
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1188 MHz
Core clock speed	1024 MHz	667 MHz
CUDA cores	768
Floating-point performance	1,825 gflops	853.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	768	640
Texture fill rate	49.2 billion / sec	26.68 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	90 Watt	65 Watt
Transistor count	2,940 million	1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	No outputs
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	7.938" (20.2 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt
SLI options	2x
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pins	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	105.6 GB / s	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6.6 GB/s	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus