NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3582
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3582
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 July 2014 vs 10 September 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3582 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 863 MHz vs 667 MHz
- 6.5x more texture fill rate: 173.2 GTexel / s vs 26.68 GTexel / s
- 3.6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 640
- 4.9x better floating-point performance: 4,156 gflops vs 853.8 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9209 vs 4750
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9209 vs 4750
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 3084
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 3084
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 863 MHz vs 667 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 173.2 GTexel / s vs 26.68 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops vs 853.8 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9209 vs 4750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9209 vs 4750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 vs 3084 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 vs 3084 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K2200M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3501 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 367 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10787 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4750 | 9209 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4750 | 9209 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3084 | 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3084 | 3331 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.133 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1441.971 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.36 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.264 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 148.747 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK110B |
Launch date | 19 July 2014 | 10 September 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 555 | 556 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 863 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 4,156 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 2304 |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 GTexel / s | 173.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 7,080 million |
Boost clock speed | 902 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |