NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
3x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 195 Watt
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3666
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3666

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	19 July 2014 vs 22 March 2012
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt vs 195 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720 vs 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720 vs 3666

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1006 MHz vs 667 MHz
4.8x more texture fill rate: 128.8 billion / sec vs 26.68 GTexel / s
2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
3.6x better floating-point performance: 3,090.4 gflops vs 853.8 gflops
Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5590 vs 3501
Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 531 vs 367
Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18363 vs 10787
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7222 vs 4750
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7222 vs 4750
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3306 vs 3084
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3306 vs 3084

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1006 MHz vs 667 MHz
Texture fill rate	128.8 billion / sec vs 26.68 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1536 vs 640
Floating-point performance	3,090.4 gflops vs 853.8 gflops
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	5590 vs 3501
PassMark - G2D Mark	531 vs 367
Geekbench - OpenCL	18363 vs 10787
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7222 vs 4750
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7222 vs 4750
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3306 vs 3084
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3306 vs 3084

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3501

5590

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

367

531

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

10787

18363

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4750

7222

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4750

7222

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3720

3666

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3720

3666

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3084

3306

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3084

3306

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K2200M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
PassMark - G3D Mark	3501	5590
PassMark - G2D Mark	367	531
Geekbench - OpenCL	10787	18363
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4750	7222
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4750	7222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720	3666
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720	3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3084	3306
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3084	3306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		46.086
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		989.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		4.645
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		36.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		99.577
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2004

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K2200M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Code name	GM107	GK104
Launch date	19 July 2014	22 March 2012
Place in performance rating	556	553
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$499
Price now		$579.99
Value for money (0-100)		12.83
Technical info
Core clock speed	667 MHz	1006 MHz
Floating-point performance	853.8 gflops	3,090.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	1536
Texture fill rate	26.68 GTexel / s	128.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	195 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,540 million
Boost clock speed		1058 MHz
CUDA cores		1536
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Display Port	1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	Two 6-pin
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.0" (25.4 cm)
SLI options		3-way
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.2
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2048 MB
Memory bandwidth	80 GB / s	192.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA