NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and NVIDIA Quadro K3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 30% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 654 MHz
• Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 31.39 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 768 vs 576
• Around 76% better floating-point performance: 1,326 gflops vs 753.4 gflops
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2014 vs 1641
• Around 72% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7252 vs 4221
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 520.747 vs 403.983
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.952 vs 15.202
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 43.535 vs 24.266
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 vs 2527
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 vs 2527

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

• Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 335 vs 291
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.45 vs 8.832
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.992 vs 0.935
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3505 vs 3275
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3333
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3505 vs 3275
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3333

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2014 1641
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	291 335
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7252 4221
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.832 14.45
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	520.747 403.983
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.935 0.992
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.952 15.202
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.535 24.266
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3188 2527
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3275 3505
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3188 2527
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3275 3505
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3353

Compare specifications (specs)