NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and NVIDIA Quadro K3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 62% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 654 MHz
• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 31.39 GTexel / s
• Around 8% better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 753.4 gflops
• Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 vs 1641
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 vs 335
• Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4493 vs 4221
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.254 vs 0.992
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.386 vs 15.202
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 2527
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 2527

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

• Around 50% higher pipelines: 576 vs 384
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 560x more memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.45 vs 12.582
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 403.983 vs 364.463
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 24.266 vs 23.499
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3505 vs 3478
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3332
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3505 vs 3478
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3332

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1749 1641
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	368 335
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4493 4221
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.582 14.45
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	364.463 403.983
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.254 0.992
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.386 15.202
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.499 24.266
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2663 2527
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3478 3505
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3332 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2663 2527
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3478 3505
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3332 3353

Compare specifications (specs)