NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K3100M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 4.1x more texture fill rate: 45.18 GTexel / s vs 11 GTexel / s
- Around 92% higher pipelines: 768 vs 400
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 1,084 gflops vs 440.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2265 vs 525
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 322 vs 247
- 5.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6060 vs 1186
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2502 vs 1684
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2502 vs 1684
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 23 November 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 45.18 GTexel / s vs 11 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 400 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,084 gflops vs 440.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2265 vs 525 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 322 vs 247 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6060 vs 1186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2502 vs 1684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2502 vs 1684 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3070 vs 2616
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3070 vs 2616
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3070 vs 2616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3070 vs 2616 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K3100M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2265 | 525 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 322 | 247 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6060 | 1186 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.239 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 426.305 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.356 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.251 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.135 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3721 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2502 | 1684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2616 | 3070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3721 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2502 | 1684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2616 | 3070 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K3100M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GK104 | Pinewood |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 23 November 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,999 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1076 | 1077 |
| Price now | $1,999 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.38 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,084 gflops | 440.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 400 |
| Texture fill rate | 45.18 GTexel / s | 11 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 627 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K3100M with others
NVIDIAQuadro K3100M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450A
NVIDIAQuadro K3100M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5470
NVIDIAQuadro K3100M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5570
NVIDIAQuadro K3100M vs
AMDRadeon R7 250E
NVIDIAQuadro K3100M vs
AMDFirePro W4190M
NVIDIAQuadro K3100M vs
AMDRadeon Vega 7
