NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs ATI Radeon HD 4890
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4000 and ATI Radeon HD 4890 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 51.84 GTexel / s vs 34.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 190 Watt
- 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 3900 MHz
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2721 vs 1539
- 6.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 424 vs 66
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 March 2013 vs 2 April 2009 |
| Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s vs 34.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 190 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz vs 3900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2721 vs 1539 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 424 vs 66 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4890
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 800 vs 768
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 1,244 gflops
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 3321
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 3321
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 810 MHz |
| Pipelines | 800 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,360.0 gflops vs 1,244 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 3321 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4890
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | ATI Radeon HD 4890 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2721 | 1539 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 424 | 66 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6674 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.462 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 427.88 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.899 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.742 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.965 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 | 3348 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | ATI Radeon HD 4890 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | GK106 | RV790 |
| Launch date | 1 March 2013 | 2 April 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,269 | $249 |
| Place in performance rating | 866 | 1258 |
| Price now | $225.65 | |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.81 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,244 gflops | 1,360.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 800 |
| Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s | 34.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 190 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 959 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 241 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 134.8 GB / s | 124.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz | 3900 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
