NVIDIA Quadro K510M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K510M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 846 MHz vs 732 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 7.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 219 Watt
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 7 December 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 846 MHz vs 732 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 219 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 43.92 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 192
- 4.3x better floating-point performance: 1,405 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 1280 MB vs 1 GB
- Around 58% higher memory clock speed: 3800 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5405 vs 1087
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5405 vs 1087
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 2012
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 2012
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3071
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3071
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops vs 324.9 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 1280 MB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 3800 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5405 vs 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5405 vs 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3071 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K510M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 641 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1087 | 5405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1087 | 5405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2012 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2012 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3071 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3071 | 3357 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.499 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 674.215 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.967 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.208 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 123.354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K510M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GK208 | GF110 |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 7 December 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 817 | 820 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 846 MHz | 732 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 324.9 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 480 |
| Texture fill rate | 13.54 GTexel / s | 43.92 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 219 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1270 Million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1280 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 19.2 GB / s | 152.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 3800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K510M with others
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670MX
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
AMDRadeon R5 235X OEM
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2200
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
