NVIDIA Quadro K510M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K510M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 846 MHz vs 732 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 7.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 219 Watt
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 7 December 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 846 MHz vs 732 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 219 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 43.92 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 192
- 4.3x better floating-point performance: 1,405 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 1280 MB vs 1 GB
- Around 58% higher memory clock speed: 3800 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5405 vs 1087
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5405 vs 1087
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 2012
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 2012
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3071
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3071
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops vs 324.9 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 1280 MB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 3800 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5405 vs 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5405 vs 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3071 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K510M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 641 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1087 | 5405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1087 | 5405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2012 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2012 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3071 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3071 | 3357 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.499 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 674.215 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.967 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.208 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 123.354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K510M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GK208 | GF110 |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 7 December 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 817 | 820 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 846 MHz | 732 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 324.9 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 480 |
| Texture fill rate | 13.54 GTexel / s | 43.92 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 219 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1270 Million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1280 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 19.2 GB / s | 152.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 3800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K510M with others
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670MX
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
AMDRadeon R5 235X OEM
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2200
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
AMDRadeon Pro 570X
