NVIDIA Quadro K510M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K510M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 3% higher core clock speed: 846 MHz vs 823 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 5.7x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 170 Watt
  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 429
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 July 2013 vs 25 January 2011
Core clock speed 846 MHz vs 823 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 170 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 441 vs 429

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

  • 3.9x more texture fill rate: 52.7 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
  • 3.9x better floating-point performance: 1,263.4 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
  • Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 2400 MHz
  • 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3051 vs 641
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4184 vs 1087
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4184 vs 1087
  • Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 2012
  • Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 2012
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3071
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3071
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 52.7 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 192
Floating-point performance 1,263.4 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
Memory clock speed 4008 MHz vs 2400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3051 vs 641
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4184 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4184 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3683 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3683 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3333 vs 3071
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3333 vs 3071

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
641
3051
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
441
429
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1087
4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1087
4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2012
3683
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2012
3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3071
3333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3071
3333
Name NVIDIA Quadro K510M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark 641 3051
PassMark - G2D Mark 441 429
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1087 4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1087 4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2012 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2012 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3071 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3071 3333
Geekbench - OpenCL 10715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 31.935
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 539.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.841
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 64.308
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 389

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K510M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Essentials

Architecture Kepler 2.0 Fermi 2.0
Code name GK208 GF114
Launch date 23 July 2013 25 January 2011
Place in performance rating 817 819
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $249
Price now $138
Value for money (0-100) 27.88

Technical info

Core clock speed 846 MHz 823 MHz
Floating-point performance 324.9 gflops 1,263.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 192 384
Texture fill rate 13.54 GTexel / s 52.7 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 170 Watt
Transistor count 1270 Million 1,950 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Length 229 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 19.2 GB / s 128.3 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 2400 MHz 4008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus