NVIDIA Quadro K510M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K510M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K510M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 3% higher core clock speed: 846 MHz vs 823 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
5.7x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 170 Watt
Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 431

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 July 2013 vs 25 January 2011
Core clock speed	846 MHz vs 823 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 170 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	441 vs 431

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

3.9x more texture fill rate: 52.7 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
3.9x better floating-point performance: 1,263.4 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 2400 MHz
4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3058 vs 641
3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4184 vs 1087
3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4184 vs 1087
Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 2012
Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 2012
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3071
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3071

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	52.7 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 192
Floating-point performance	1,263.4 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
Memory clock speed	4008 MHz vs 2400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3058 vs 641
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4184 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4184 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3683 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3683 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3333 vs 3071
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3333 vs 3071

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

641

3058

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

441

431

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1087

4184

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1087

4184

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2012

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2012

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3071

3333

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3071

3333

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K510M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	641	3058
PassMark - G2D Mark	441	431
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1087	4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1087	4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2012	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2012	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3071	3333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3071	3333
Geekbench - OpenCL		10727
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		31.935
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		539.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		35.841
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		64.308
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		389

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K510M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GK208	GF114
Launch date	23 July 2013	25 January 2011
Place in performance rating	818	820
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$249
Price now		$138
Value for money (0-100)		27.88
Technical info
Core clock speed	846 MHz	823 MHz
Floating-point performance	324.9 gflops	1,263.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	192	384
Texture fill rate	13.54 GTexel / s	52.7 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	170 Watt
Transistor count	1270 Million	1,950 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Length		229 mm
Supplementary power connectors		2x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	19.2 GB / s	128.3 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2400 MHz	4008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus