NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 846 MHz
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 192
- 4.4x better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3552 vs 641
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 543 vs 441
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 1087
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 1087
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1046 MHz vs 846 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops vs 324.9 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3552 vs 641 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 543 vs 441 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 vs 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 vs 1087 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 68 Watt
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2012 vs 1577
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3071 vs 1671
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2012 vs 1577
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3071 vs 1671
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 68 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2012 vs 1577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3071 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2012 vs 1577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3071 vs 1671 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | NVIDIA Quadro K510M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3552 | 641 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 543 | 441 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.094 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.455 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 165.39 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 | 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1577 | 2012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1671 | 3071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 | 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1577 | 2012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1671 | 3071 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1193 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | NVIDIA Quadro K510M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | GM107 | GK208 |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $395.75 | |
Place in performance rating | 815 | 817 |
Price now | $343.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.01 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1046 MHz | 846 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops | 324.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 GTexel / s | 13.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1270 Million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 202 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Shader Model | 5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |