NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 846 MHz
  • 3.3x more texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
  • 3.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 192
  • 4.4x better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
  • 2.1x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2400 MHz
  • 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3552 vs 641
  • Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 543 vs 441
  • 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 1087
  • 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 1087
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 22 July 2014 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed 1046 MHz vs 846 MHz
Texture fill rate 44.96 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 192
Floating-point performance 1,439 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 2400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3552 vs 641
PassMark - G2D Mark 543 vs 441
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4921 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4921 vs 1087

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M

  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 68 Watt
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2012 vs 1577
  • Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3071 vs 1671
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2012 vs 1577
  • Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3071 vs 1671
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 68 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2012 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3071 vs 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2012 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3071 vs 1671

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3552
641
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
543
441
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4921
1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1577
2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1671
3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4921
1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1577
2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1671
3071
Name NVIDIA Quadro K2200 NVIDIA Quadro K510M
PassMark - G3D Mark 3552 641
PassMark - G2D Mark 543 441
Geekbench - OpenCL 12020
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 40.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 30.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 165.39
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4921 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1577 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1671 3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4921 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1577 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1671 3071
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1193

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Kepler 2.0
Code name GM107 GK208
Launch date 22 July 2014 23 July 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $395.75
Place in performance rating 815 817
Price now $343.99
Type Workstation Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100) 13.01

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 1046 MHz 846 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,439 gflops 324.9 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 640 192
Texture fill rate 44.96 GTexel / s 13.54 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 68 Watt 30 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 1270 Million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort No outputs
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
Length 202 mm
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model 5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 80.19 GB / s 19.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 2400 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus