NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 846 MHz
3.3x more texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
3.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 192
4.4x better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
2.1x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2400 MHz
5.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3550 vs 641
Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 544 vs 441
4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 1087
4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 1087

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	22 July 2014 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	1046 MHz vs 846 MHz
Texture fill rate	44.96 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 192
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 2400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3550 vs 641
PassMark - G2D Mark	544 vs 441
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4921 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4921 vs 1087

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M

2.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 68 Watt
Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2012 vs 1577
Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3071 vs 1671
Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2012 vs 1577
Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3071 vs 1671

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 68 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2012 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3071 vs 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2012 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3071 vs 1671

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3550

641

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

544

441

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4921

1087

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1577

2012

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1671

3071

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4921

1087

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1577

2012

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1671

3071

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K2200	NVIDIA Quadro K510M
PassMark - G3D Mark	3550	641
PassMark - G2D Mark	544	441
Geekbench - OpenCL	12020
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	40.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	165.39
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4921	1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1577	2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1671	3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4921	1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1577	2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1671	3071
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1193

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K2200	NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler 2.0
Code name	GM107	GK208
Launch date	22 July 2014	23 July 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$395.75
Place in performance rating	815	817
Price now	$343.99
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100)	13.01
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz
Core clock speed	1046 MHz	846 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops	324.9 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	192
Texture fill rate	44.96 GTexel / s	13.54 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	68 Watt	30 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	1270 Million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	202 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model		5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB / s	19.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	2400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus