NVIDIA Quadro K510M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K510M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • Around 41% higher core clock speed: 846 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 371
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 July 2013 vs 1 October 2012
Core clock speed 846 MHz vs 600 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 100 Watt
Memory clock speed 2400 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 441 vs 371

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

  • 3.5x more texture fill rate: 48.0 billion / sec vs 13.54 GTexel / s
  • 5x more pipelines: 960 vs 192
  • 3.9x better floating-point performance: 1,256 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2717 vs 641
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4175 vs 1087
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4175 vs 1087
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3383 vs 2012
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3383 vs 2012
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 3071
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 3071
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 48.0 billion / sec vs 13.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines 960 vs 192
Floating-point performance 1,256 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2717 vs 641
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4175 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4175 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3383 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3383 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3334 vs 3071
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3334 vs 3071

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
641
2717
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
441
371
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1087
4175
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1087
4175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2012
3383
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2012
3383
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3071
3334
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3071
3334
Name NVIDIA Quadro K510M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
PassMark - G3D Mark 641 2717
PassMark - G2D Mark 441 371
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1087 4175
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1087 4175
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2012 3383
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2012 3383
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3071 3334
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3071 3334
Geekbench - OpenCL 10649
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 665.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.9
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 36.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 62.895

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K510M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

Essentials

Architecture Kepler 2.0 Kepler
Code name GK208 GK104
Launch date 23 July 2013 1 October 2012
Place in performance rating 823 826
Type Mobile workstation Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 846 MHz 600 MHz
Floating-point performance 324.9 gflops 1,256 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 192 960
Texture fill rate 13.54 GTexel / s 48.0 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 1270 Million 3,540 million
CUDA cores 960

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Display Port 1.2
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size medium sized large
Bus support PCI Express 2.0
SLI options 2-way
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 12 API
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Shader Model 5
Vulkan
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 19.2 GB / s 115.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 2400 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
FXAA
SLI
TXAA