NVIDIA Quadro K510M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K510M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K510M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
3.7x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 110 Watt
480x more memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 416

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 July 2013 vs 9 October 2012
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 110 Watt
Memory clock speed	2400 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	441 vs 416

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Around 10% higher core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 846 MHz
4.4x more texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 13.54 GTexel / s
4x more pipelines: 768 vs 192
4.4x better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 vs 641
3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 1087
3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 1087
Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 2012
Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 2012
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 3071
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 3071

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	928 MHz vs 846 MHz
Texture fill rate	59.2 billion / sec vs 13.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 192
Floating-point performance	1,425 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2527 vs 641
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3948 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3948 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3707 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3707 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3335 vs 3071
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3335 vs 3071

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

641

2527

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

441

416

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1087

3948

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1087

3948

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2012

3707

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2012

3707

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3071

3335

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3071

3335

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K510M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	641	2527
PassMark - G2D Mark	441	416
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1087	3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1087	3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2012	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2012	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3071	3335
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3071	3335
Geekbench - OpenCL		7900
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		23.168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		592.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		28.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		47.404
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		881

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K510M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GK208	GK106
Launch date	23 July 2013	9 October 2012
Place in performance rating	845	846
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$149
Price now		$169.99
Value for money (0-100)		18.72
Technical info
Core clock speed	846 MHz	928 MHz
Floating-point performance	324.9 gflops	1,425 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	192	768
Texture fill rate	13.54 GTexel / s	59.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	110 Watt
Transistor count	1270 Million	2,540 million
CUDA cores		768
Maximum GPU temperature		105 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini...
Display Port	1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors		One 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.3
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	19.2 GB / s	86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2400 MHz	5.4 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
TXAA