NVIDIA Quadro K510M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K510M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 69% higher core clock speed: 846 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 403
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 7 January 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 846 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 vs 403 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 20 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
- 4.2x more pipelines: 800 vs 192
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 800.0 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 763 vs 641
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1643 vs 1087
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1643 vs 1087
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3314 vs 2012
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3314 vs 2012
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3071
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3071
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 20 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 800 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops vs 324.9 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 763 vs 641 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1643 vs 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1643 vs 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3314 vs 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3314 vs 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3071 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K510M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 641 | 763 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 | 403 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1087 | 1643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1087 | 1643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2012 | 3314 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2012 | 3314 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3071 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3071 | 3356 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.457 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 512.081 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K510M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GK208 | Broadway |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 7 January 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 845 | 848 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 846 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 324.9 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 800 |
| Texture fill rate | 13.54 GTexel / s | 20 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1270 Million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 19.2 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| HDMI 1.3a | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K510M with others
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5850
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450A
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
AMDFirePro M6100
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 825M
NVIDIAQuadro K510M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 830A
