NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs ATI Radeon 7200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620M and ATI Radeon 7200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 7.2x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 143 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 180 nm
- 64x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 32 MB
- 12.6x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 143 MHz
- 387.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1163 vs 3
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 157 vs 94
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2015 vs 1 June 2000 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 143 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 180 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 32 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 143 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1163 vs 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 157 vs 94 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 7200
- 55.4x more texture fill rate: 996 MTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 30 Watt
Texture fill rate | 996 MTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 7200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K620M | ATI Radeon 7200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1163 | 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 157 | 94 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5974 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.872 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.904 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.813 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1349 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1349 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K620M | ATI Radeon 7200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Rage 6 |
Code name | GM108 | R100 |
Launch date | 1 March 2015 | 1 June 2000 |
Place in performance rating | 1414 | 1412 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 143 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 180 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 996 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 30 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x VGA |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 7.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.3 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 32 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 5.31 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 143 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |