NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs AMD Radeon R7 M265
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620M and AMD Radeon R7 M265 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 36% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 633.6 gflops
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1163 vs 540
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 157 vs 136
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5974 vs 5587
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.872 vs 12.031
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.813 vs 68.392
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2015 vs 20 May 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 633.6 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1163 vs 540 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 157 vs 136 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5974 vs 5587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.872 vs 12.031 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.813 vs 68.392 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M265
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 19.8 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 282.111 vs 165.904
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1551 vs 1291
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1264 vs 927
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2424 vs 1349
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1551 vs 1291
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1264 vs 927
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2424 vs 1349
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 282.111 vs 165.904 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1551 vs 1291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1264 vs 927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2424 vs 1349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1551 vs 1291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1264 vs 927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2424 vs 1349 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M265
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K620M | AMD Radeon R7 M265 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1163 | 540 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 157 | 136 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5974 | 5587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.872 | 12.031 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.904 | 282.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.813 | 68.392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1291 | 1551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 927 | 1264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1349 | 2424 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1291 | 1551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 927 | 1264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1349 | 2424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.455 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.704 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K620M | AMD Radeon R7 M265 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GM108 | Topaz |
Launch date | 1 March 2015 | 20 May 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1414 | 1416 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | 825 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 19.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 32 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |