NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K620M and NVIDIA GeForce 8300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 11.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1163 vs 102
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1349 vs 329
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1349 vs 329
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2015 vs 17 April 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1163 vs 102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1349 vs 329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1349 vs 329 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8300
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 168 vs 157
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 168 vs 157 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8300
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K620M | NVIDIA GeForce 8300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1163 | 102 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 157 | 168 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5992 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.872 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.904 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.813 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1349 | 329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1349 | 329 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K620M | NVIDIA GeForce 8300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla |
Code name | GM108 | C78 |
Launch date | 1 March 2015 | 17 April 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1417 | 1414 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Price now | $22.68 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.26 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCI |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |