NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs AMD Radeon R7 M360
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and AMD Radeon R7 M360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 31.78 GTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 18% better floating-point performance: 1,017 gflops vs 864.0 gflops
- 5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2835 vs 581
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 148
- Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8849 vs 4769
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 vs 14.911
- 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 721.18 vs 141.079
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 vs 0.927
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.938 vs 14.763
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 137.786 vs 49.774
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 1384
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 1280
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2460
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 1384
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 1280
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2460
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops vs 864.0 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2835 vs 581 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 vs 148 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8849 vs 4769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 vs 14.911 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 721.18 vs 141.079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.056 vs 0.927 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.938 vs 14.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 137.786 vs 49.774 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4196 vs 1384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 1280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2460 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4196 vs 1384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 1280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 2460 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M360
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 993 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 1072 MHz
- 2048x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 1072 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M360
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | AMD Radeon R7 M360 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2835 | 581 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 148 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8849 | 4769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 | 14.911 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 721.18 | 141.079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.056 | 0.927 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.938 | 14.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 137.786 | 49.774 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4196 | 1384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 1280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 2460 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4196 | 1384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 1280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 2460 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1002 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | AMD Radeon R7 M360 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Meso |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $200.89 | |
Place in performance rating | 806 | 1436 |
Price now | $203.37 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.10 | |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1072 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s | 27 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
Compute units | 6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB / 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |