NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 17% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 846 MHz
2.3x more texture fill rate: 31.78 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
2.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 192
3.1x better floating-point performance: 1,017 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
2.1x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2400 MHz
4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2881 vs 641
3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 1087
Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 2012
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3071
3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 1087
Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 2012
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3071

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 August 2015 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	993 MHz vs 846 MHz
Texture fill rate	31.78 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 vs 192
Floating-point performance	1,017 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 2400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2881 vs 641
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3071

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 40 Watt
512x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 312

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 40 Watt
Maximum memory size	1 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	441 vs 312

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2881

641

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

312

441

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4196

1087

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

2012

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3071

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4196

1087

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

2012

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3071

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	NVIDIA Quadro K510M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2881	641
PassMark - G2D Mark	312	441
Geekbench - OpenCL	8849
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	721.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	42.938
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196	1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716	2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196	1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716	2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3071
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1002

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler 2.0
Code name	GM107	GK208
Launch date	18 August 2015	23 July 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$200.89
Place in performance rating	828	831
Price now	$203.37
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100)	16.10
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1072 MHz
Core clock speed	993 MHz	846 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,017 gflops	324.9 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	192
Texture fill rate	31.78 GTexel / s	13.54 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	30 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	1270 Million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size	large	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5.0	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB / 4 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	80 GB / s	19.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	2400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus