NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 31.78 GTexel / s vs 26.7 billion / sec
Around 45% higher pipelines: 512 vs 352
Around 19% better floating-point performance: 1,017 gflops vs 855.4 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
5x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 200 Watt
3.1x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2881 vs 2673
2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 vs 19.079
Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 vs 2.516
Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.938 vs 24.513
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 137.786 vs 64.492
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 2999
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3660
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3321
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 2999
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3660
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3321

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 August 2015 vs 31 May 2010
Texture fill rate	31.78 GTexel / s vs 26.7 billion / sec
Pipelines	512 vs 352
Floating-point performance	1,017 gflops vs 855.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 200 Watt
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2881 vs 2673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33 vs 19.079
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056 vs 2.516
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	42.938 vs 24.513
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786 vs 64.492
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196 vs 2999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716 vs 3660
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196 vs 2999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716 vs 3660
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3321

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465

Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 993 MHz
512x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 462 vs 312
Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9276 vs 8849
Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 741.303 vs 721.18

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1215 MHz vs 993 MHz
Maximum memory size	1 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	462 vs 312
Geekbench - OpenCL	9276 vs 8849
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	741.303 vs 721.18

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2881

2673

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

312

462

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8849

9276

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

38.33

19.079

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

721.18

741.303

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.056

2.516

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

42.938

24.513

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

137.786

64.492

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4196

2999

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

3660

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3321

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4196

2999

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

3660

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3321

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
PassMark - G3D Mark	2881	2673
PassMark - G2D Mark	312	462
Geekbench - OpenCL	8849	9276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33	19.079
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	721.18	741.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056	2.516
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	42.938	24.513
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786	64.492
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196	2999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716	3660
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196	2999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716	3660
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3321
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1002

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Code name	GM107	GF100
Launch date	18 August 2015	31 May 2010
Launch price (MSRP)	$200.89	$279
Place in performance rating	832	825
Price now	$203.37	$263.28
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	16.10	12.73
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1072 MHz
Core clock speed	993 MHz	1215 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,017 gflops	855.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	512	352
Texture fill rate	31.78 GTexel / s	26.7 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	200 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,100 million
Compute performance		30x
CUDA cores		352
Maximum GPU temperature		105 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Display Port	1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	Two 6-pins
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height		4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Length		9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
SLI options		2-way3-way
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.2
Shader Model	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB / 4 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	80 GB / s	102.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Vision
CUDA
DSR
SLI
Surround