NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon E8950

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile and AMD Radeon E8950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

AMD Radeon E8950

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1093 MHz vs 735 MHz
2.1x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 95 Watt

Launch date	11 January 2017 vs 29 September 2015
Core clock speed	1093 MHz vs 735 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt vs 95 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8950

2.9x more texture fill rate: 128.0 GTexel / s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
3.2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 640
2.9x better floating-point performance: 4,096 gflops vs 1,399 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 66.837 vs 52.821
Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1369.722 vs 793.297
Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.633 vs 3.631
Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.836 vs 48.966
2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 326.391 vs 163.204

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	128.0 GTexel / s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2048 vs 640
Floating-point performance	4,096 gflops vs 1,399 gflops
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	66.837 vs 52.821
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1369.722 vs 793.297
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.633 vs 3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	65.836 vs 48.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	326.391 vs 163.204

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8950

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

52.821

66.837

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

793.297

1369.722

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.631

6.633

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

48.966

65.836

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

163.204

326.391

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile	AMD Radeon E8950
PassMark - G3D Mark	3237
PassMark - G2D Mark	318
Geekbench - OpenCL	10582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	52.821	66.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	793.297	1369.722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.631	6.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	48.966	65.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	163.204	326.391
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4941
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2645
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4941
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2645
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile	AMD Radeon E8950
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 3.0
Code name	GM107	Amethyst
Launch date	11 January 2017	29 September 2015
Place in performance rating	771	773
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Core clock speed	1093 MHz	735 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,399 gflops	4,096 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	2048
Texture fill rate	43.72 GTexel / s	128.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	95 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	5,000 million
Boost clock speed		1000 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB / s	192.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5