NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile vs ATI Radeon HD 4550
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile and ATI Radeon HD 4550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1093 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 9.1x more texture fill rate: 43.72 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 640 vs 80
- 14.6x better floating-point performance: 1,399 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- 3.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1310 MHz
- 13.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3236 vs 236
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 558
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 558
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 30 September 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1093 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 43.72 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,399 gflops vs 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1310 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3236 vs 236 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 558 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 558 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4550
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 429 vs 316
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 429 vs 316 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4550
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | ATI Radeon HD 4550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3236 | 236 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 316 | 429 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.821 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.297 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.966 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.204 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4941 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 558 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4941 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 558 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | ATI Radeon HD 4550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
Code name | GM107 | RV710 |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 30 September 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 772 | 769 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1093 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,399 gflops | 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 43.72 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 10.48 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1310 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |