NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs ATI FirePro M7740
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and ATI FirePro M7740 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 796 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 56.64 GTexel / s vs 20.8 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 1,812 gflops vs 832.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 95% higher memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 3384 MHz
- 6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3983 vs 665
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 561 vs 415
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 April 2016 vs 4 August 2009 |
Core clock speed | 796 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 56.64 GTexel / s vs 20.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 1,812 gflops vs 832.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 3384 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3983 vs 665 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 561 vs 415 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 3309 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro M7740
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2000
GPU 2: ATI FirePro M7740
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M2000 | ATI FirePro M7740 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3983 | 665 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 561 | 415 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14534 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.048 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.056 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.697 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.868 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5523 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5523 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | 3309 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 | ATI FirePro M7740 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GM206 | M97 |
Launch date | 8 April 2016 | 4 August 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $437.75 | |
Place in performance rating | 597 | 600 |
Price now | $409.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.23 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1163 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 796 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,812 gflops | 832.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 56.64 GTexel / s | 20.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 826 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP | No outputs |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 201 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz | 3384 MHz |
Memory type | 128 Bit | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 54.1 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |