NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and NVIDIA Tesla K40m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Tesla K40m

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 19% higher core clock speed: 796 MHz vs 667 MHz
Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1163 MHz vs 745 MHz
3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 245 Watt
Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 6008 MHz
Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4000 vs 3143
3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 565 vs 184

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	8 April 2016 vs 22 November 2013
Core clock speed	796 MHz vs 667 MHz
Boost clock speed	1163 MHz vs 745 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 245 Watt
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz vs 6008 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4000 vs 3143
PassMark - G2D Mark	565 vs 184

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40m

3.2x more texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 56.64 GTexel / s
3.8x more pipelines: 2880 vs 768
2.4x better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 1,812 gflops
3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19519 vs 14591
Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 68.519 vs 55.048
2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1884.11 vs 639.056
Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.358 vs 3.697
3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.253 vs 35.796
Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 310.472 vs 225.868

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	178.8 GTexel / s vs 56.64 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2880 vs 768
Floating-point performance	4,291 gflops vs 1,812 gflops
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	19519 vs 14591
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	68.519 vs 55.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1884.11 vs 639.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.358 vs 3.697
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	117.253 vs 35.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	310.472 vs 225.868

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K40m

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4000

3143

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

565

184

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14591

19519

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

55.048

68.519

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

639.056

1884.11

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.697

6.358

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

35.796

117.253

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

225.868

310.472

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M2000	NVIDIA Tesla K40m
PassMark - G3D Mark	4000	3143
PassMark - G2D Mark	565	184
Geekbench - OpenCL	14591	19519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	55.048	68.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	639.056	1884.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.697	6.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	35.796	117.253
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	225.868	310.472
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3325

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M2000	NVIDIA Tesla K40m
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GM206	GK110B
Launch date	8 April 2016	22 November 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$437.75	$7,699
Place in performance rating	572	574
Price now	$409.99
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	13.23
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1163 MHz	745 MHz
Core clock speed	796 MHz	667 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,812 gflops	4,291 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	768	2880
Texture fill rate	56.64 GTexel / s	178.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	245 Watt
Transistor count	2,940 million	7,080 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP	No outputs
Number of simultaneous displays	4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	201 mm	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
Width	1" (2.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory type	128 Bit	GDDR5
Memory bandwidth		288.4 GB / s
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management