NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2000M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 1006 MHz
  • Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1098 MHz vs 1072 MHz
  • 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date 3 December 2015 vs 19 November 2013
Core clock speed 1029 MHz vs 1006 MHz
Boost clock speed 1098 MHz vs 1072 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt vs 250 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

  • 47.9x more texture fill rate: 2x 102.9 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 43.92 GTexel / s
  • 3.6x more pipelines: 2x 1152 vs 640
  • 3.5x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,470 gflops vs 1,405 gflops
  • Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.396 vs 3.5
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 2x 102.9 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 43.92 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2x 1152 vs 640
Floating-point performance 2x 2,470 gflops vs 1,405 gflops
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.396 vs 3.5

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3.5
7.396
Name NVIDIA Quadro M2000M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark 3467
PassMark - G2D Mark 339
Geekbench - OpenCL 8148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 47.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 782.113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.5 7.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 51.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 171.268
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Kepler
Code name GM107 GK104
Launch date 3 December 2015 19 November 2013
Place in performance rating 702 878
Type Mobile workstation Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1098 MHz 1072 MHz
Core clock speed 1029 MHz 1006 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,405 gflops 2x 2,470 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 640 2x 1152
Texture fill rate 43.92 GTexel / s 2x 102.9 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 8-pin
Length 279 mm

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Shader Model 5.0
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2x 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 80 GB / s 2x 192.3 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 6008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus