NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 773 MHz vs 719 MHz
- 5.6x more texture fill rate: 80.39 GTexel / s vs 14.38 GTexel / s
- 4.3x more pipelines: 1664 vs 384
- 4.7x better floating-point performance: 2,573 gflops vs 552.2 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6670 vs 743
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 1436
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 1711
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 1436
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 1711
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 June 2015 vs 1 July 2014 |
Core clock speed | 773 MHz vs 719 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 80.39 GTexel / s vs 14.38 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1664 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,573 gflops vs 552.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6670 vs 743 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 1436 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 1711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 1436 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 1711 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 714 vs 670
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 714 vs 670 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6670 | 743 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 670 | 714 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 732.046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.725 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 1436 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 1711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 1436 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 1711 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | GM204 | GK208 |
Launch date | 29 June 2015 | 1 July 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $791 | |
Place in performance rating | 520 | 521 |
Price now | $765.93 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.68 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 773 MHz | 719 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,573 gflops | 552.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1664 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 80.39 GTexel / s | 14.38 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | No outputs |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 241 mm | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |