NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 773 MHz vs 589 MHz
- 34.1x more texture fill rate: 80.39 GTexel / s vs 2.356 GTexel / s
- 208x more pipelines: 1664 vs 8
- 114.7x better floating-point performance: 2,573 gflops vs 22.432 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
- 7.5x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 53x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6673 vs 126
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 309
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 June 2015 vs 26 November 2009 |
Core clock speed | 773 MHz vs 589 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 80.39 GTexel / s vs 2.356 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1664 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 2,573 gflops vs 22.432 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6673 vs 126 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 vs 309 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
- 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 120 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6673 | 126 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | 309 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 732.046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.725 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GM204 | GT218 |
Launch date | 29 June 2015 | 26 November 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $791 | |
Place in performance rating | 523 | 521 |
Price now | $765.93 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.68 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 773 MHz | 589 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,573 gflops | 22.432 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1664 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 80.39 GTexel / s | 2.356 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 31 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 168 mm |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | None |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |