NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and NVIDIA Tesla K40c videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 4% higher core clock speed: 773 MHz vs 745 MHz
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 245 Watt
  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6692 vs 4495
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 683 vs 325
  • Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18372 vs 17468
  • Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.548 vs 61.566
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 29 June 2015 vs 8 October 2013
Core clock speed 773 MHz vs 745 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 120 Watt vs 245 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 6692 vs 4495
PassMark - G2D Mark 683 vs 325
Geekbench - OpenCL 18372 vs 17468
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 65.548 vs 61.566

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40c

  • 2.2x more texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 80.39 GTexel / s
  • Around 73% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 1664
  • Around 67% better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 2,573 gflops
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1779.043 vs 732.046
  • Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.463 vs 5.453
  • 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 103.169 vs 17.725
  • Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 308.261 vs 217.357
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 178.8 GTexel / s vs 80.39 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2880 vs 1664
Floating-point performance 4,291 gflops vs 2,573 gflops
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1779.043 vs 732.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.463 vs 5.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 103.169 vs 17.725
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 308.261 vs 217.357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K40c

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6692
4495
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
683
325
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
18372
17468
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
65.548
61.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
732.046
1779.043
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.453
6.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
17.725
103.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
217.357
308.261
Name NVIDIA Quadro M4000 NVIDIA Tesla K40c
PassMark - G3D Mark 6692 4495
PassMark - G2D Mark 683 325
Geekbench - OpenCL 18372 17468
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 65.548 61.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 732.046 1779.043
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.453 6.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 17.725 103.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 217.357 308.261
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3332
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3332
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2302

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro M4000 NVIDIA Tesla K40c

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell 2.0 Kepler
Code name GM204 GK110B
Launch date 29 June 2015 8 October 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $791 $7,699
Place in performance rating 517 513
Price now $765.93
Type Workstation Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 10.68

Technical info

Core clock speed 773 MHz 745 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,573 gflops 4,291 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1664 2880
Texture fill rate 80.39 GTexel / s 178.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 120 Watt 245 Watt
Transistor count 5,200 million 7,080 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo No outputs
Multi-display synchronization Quadro Sync
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 241 mm 267 mm
SLI options 1
Supplementary power connectors 1 x 6-pin 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width 1" (2.5 cm)

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Memory bus width 256 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz 6008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Memory bandwidth 288.4 GB / s

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
High-Performance Video I/O6
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management