NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 55% higher texture fill rate: 80.39 GTexel / s vs 51.84 GTexel / s
• 2.2x more pipelines: 1664 vs 768
• 2.1x better floating-point performance: 2,573 gflops vs 1,244 gflops
• 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5616 MHz
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 vs 2721
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 424
• 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18372 vs 6674
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.548 vs 18.462
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 732.046 vs 427.88
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.453 vs 1.899
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 217.357 vs 61.965
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6291 vs 3798
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 3651
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6291 vs 3798
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 3651

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000

• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 773 MHz
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.742 vs 17.725
• Around 20% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 817 vs 680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6680 2721
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	673 424
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	18372 6674
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.548 18.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	732.046 427.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.453 1.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.725 23.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	217.357 61.965
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6291 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3685 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3332 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6291 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3685 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3332 3321
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	680 817

Compare specifications (specs)