NVIDIA Quadro M4000 versus NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 55% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 80.39 GTexel / s versus 51.84 GTexel / s
- 2.2x plus de pipelines: 1664 versus 768
- 2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,573 gflops versus 1,244 gflops
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 7% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 5616 MHz
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 versus 2721
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 versus 424
- 2.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 18372 versus 6674
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.548 versus 18.462
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 732.046 versus 427.88
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.453 versus 1.899
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 217.357 versus 61.965
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6291 versus 3798
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 3651
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6291 versus 3798
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 3651
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 June 2015 versus 1 March 2013 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 80.39 GTexel / s versus 51.84 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1664 versus 768 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,573 gflops versus 1,244 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 3 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 5616 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 versus 2721 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 versus 424 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 versus 6674 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 versus 18.462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 732.046 versus 427.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 versus 1.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 versus 61.965 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6291 versus 3798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6291 versus 3798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 3321 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 773 MHz
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.742 versus 17.725
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 817 versus 680
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 773 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.742 versus 17.725 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 versus 680 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 | 2721 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | 424 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 | 6674 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 | 18.462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 732.046 | 427.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 | 1.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.725 | 23.742 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 | 61.965 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6291 | 3798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6291 | 3798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3321 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 680 | 817 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM204 | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 29 June 2015 | 1 March 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $791 | $1,269 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 534 | 866 |
Prix maintenant | $765.93 | $225.65 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.68 | 14.81 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 773 MHz | 810 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,573 gflops | 1,244 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1664 | 768 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 80.39 GTexel / s | 51.84 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 80 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 2,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync | |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 241 mm |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 5616 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 134.8 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |