NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs AMD Radeon HD 8970M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and AMD Radeon HD 8970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 15% higher core clock speed: 975 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1013 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 72 GTexel / s
• Around 8% better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 2,304 gflops
• Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4800 MHz
• Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6186 vs 3876
• Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19212 vs 18661
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 81.104 vs 57.241
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.338 vs 1223.742
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.157 vs 5.78
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7602 vs 2521
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3093 vs 2595
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7602 vs 2521
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3093 vs 2595

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8970M

• Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 vs 417
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 89.306 vs 68.443
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 268.643 vs 251.464
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 vs 2749
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 vs 2749

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8970M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6186 3876
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	417 807
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	19212 18661
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	81.104 57.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1235.338 1223.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.157 5.78
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	68.443 89.306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	251.464 268.643
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7602 2521
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2749 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3093 2595
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7602 2521
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2749 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3093 2595

Compare specifications (specs)