NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs ATI Radeon E2400

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and ATI Radeon E2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 63% higher core clock speed: 975 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • 32.5x more texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
  • 32x more pipelines: 1,280 vs 40
  • 52x better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 48 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
  • 32x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 128 MB
  • 3.6x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1400 MHz
  • 118.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6149 vs 52
  • Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 412 vs 287
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 August 2015 vs 28 June 2007
Core clock speed 975 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate 78 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1,280 vs 40
Floating-point performance 2,496 gflops vs 48 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 128 MB
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 6149 vs 52
PassMark - G2D Mark 412 vs 287

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon E2400

  • 4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 100 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 100 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon E2400

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6149
52
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
412
287
Name NVIDIA Quadro M4000M ATI Radeon E2400
PassMark - G3D Mark 6149 52
PassMark - G2D Mark 412 287
Geekbench - OpenCL 19892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 81.104
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1235.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 68.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 251.464
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3093
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M ATI Radeon E2400

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell 2.0 TeraScale
Code name GM204 RV610
Launch date 18 August 2015 28 June 2007
Place in performance rating 566 569
Type Mobile workstation Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1013 MHz
Core clock speed 975 MHz 600 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,496 gflops 48 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 1,280 40
Texture fill rate 78 GTexel / s 2.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt 25 Watt
Transistor count 5,200 million 180 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-II
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 10.0
OpenGL 4.5 3.3
Shader Model 5.0
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Memory bandwidth 160 GB / s 11.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 1400 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus