NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 975 MHz vs 776 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 37.2 GTexel / s
- 4.4x more pipelines: 1,280 vs 288
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 894.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 102 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 31% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3828 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6149 vs 2006
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3093 vs 1914
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3093 vs 1914
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 24 April 2012 |
Core clock speed | 975 MHz vs 776 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s vs 37.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1,280 vs 288 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops vs 894.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 102 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 3828 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6149 vs 2006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3093 vs 1914 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3093 vs 1914 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 443 vs 412
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 443 vs 412 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M4000M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6149 | 2006 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 | 443 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19892 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 81.104 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.157 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 68.443 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.464 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7602 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2749 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3093 | 1914 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7602 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2749 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3093 | 1914 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GM204 | GF114 |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 24 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 564 | 565 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1013 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 776 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 894.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1,280 | 288 |
Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s | 37.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 102 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Length | 210 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 91.9 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3828 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |