NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P600 and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 975 MHz
• Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 1013 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 533 vs 412
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2749
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3093
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2749
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3093

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 34.92 GTexel / s
• 3.3x more pipelines: 1,280 vs 384
• 2.2x better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 1,117 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4012 MHz
• Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6149 vs 3317
• Around 78% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19892 vs 11181
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 81.104 vs 35.134
• Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 251.464 vs 141.164
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7602 vs 4662
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7602 vs 4662

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3317 6149
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	533 412
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11181 19892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.134 81.104
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	141.164 251.464
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4662 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4662 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3093

Compare specifications (specs)