NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs AMD Radeon R7 A265

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M5000M and AMD Radeon R7 A265 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

AMD Radeon R7 A265

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 34% higher core clock speed: 975 MHz vs 725 MHz
Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1051 MHz vs 825 MHz
4.7x more texture fill rate: 93.6 GTexel / s vs 19.8 GTexel / s
4x more pipelines: 1,536 vs 384
4.7x better floating-point performance: 2,995 gflops vs 633.6 gflops
4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7000 vs 994
Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 471 vs 468
3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22762 vs 6925

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 August 2015 vs 9 January 2014
Core clock speed	975 MHz vs 725 MHz
Boost clock speed	1051 MHz vs 825 MHz
Texture fill rate	93.6 GTexel / s vs 19.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1,536 vs 384
Floating-point performance	2,995 gflops vs 633.6 gflops
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7000 vs 994
PassMark - G2D Mark	471 vs 468
Geekbench - OpenCL	22762 vs 6925

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 A265

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7000

994

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

471

468

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

22762

6925

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M5000M	AMD Radeon R7 A265
PassMark - G3D Mark	7000	994
PassMark - G2D Mark	471	468
Geekbench - OpenCL	22762	6925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	95.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1341.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	83.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	366.321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3339
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M5000M	AMD Radeon R7 A265
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	GM204	Opal
Launch date	18 August 2015	9 January 2014
Place in performance rating	460	463
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1051 MHz	825 MHz
Core clock speed	975 MHz	725 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,995 gflops	633.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1,536	384
Texture fill rate	93.6 GTexel / s	19.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt
Transistor count	5,200 million	1,040 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	160 GB / s	28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus