NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro M5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 975 MHz
  • Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 1051 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3685
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3685
  • Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6135 vs 3339
  • Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6135 vs 3339
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 July 2017 vs 18 August 2015
Core clock speed 1215 MHz vs 975 MHz
Boost clock speed 1468 MHz vs 1051 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 6135 vs 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 6135 vs 3339

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

  • 2x more pipelines: 1,536 vs 768
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4096 MB
  • Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22846 vs 19407
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9399 vs 7710
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9399 vs 7710
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 1,536 vs 768
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4096 MB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 22846 vs 19407
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9399 vs 7710
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9399 vs 7710

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
19407
22846
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6135
3339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6135
3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7710
9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7710
9399
Name NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
Geekbench - OpenCL 19407 22846
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 6135 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 6135 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7710 9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7710 9399
PassMark - G3D Mark 7020
PassMark - G2D Mark 478
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 95.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1341.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 83.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 366.321
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Maxwell 2.0
Code name GP107GL GM204
Launch date 5 July 2017 18 August 2015
Place in performance rating 461 463
Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1468 MHz 1051 MHz
Core clock speed 1215 MHz 975 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 1,536
Floating-point performance 2,995 gflops
Texture fill rate 93.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt
Transistor count 5,200 million

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenGL 4.5
Shader Model 5.0
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4096 MB 8 GB
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz 5012 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Memory bandwidth 160 GB / s
Shared memory 0

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus