NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro M5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 975 MHz
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 1051 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3685
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6135 vs 3339
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6135 vs 3339
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 July 2017 vs 18 August 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 975 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz vs 1051 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6135 vs 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6135 vs 3339 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
- 2x more pipelines: 1,536 vs 768
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4096 MB
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22875 vs 19434
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9399 vs 7710
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9399 vs 7710
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1,536 vs 768 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4096 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22875 vs 19434 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9399 vs 7710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9399 vs 7710 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro M5000M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19434 | 22875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6135 | 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6135 | 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7710 | 9399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7710 | 9399 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7004 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 477 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 95.613 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1341.18 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.869 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 83.683 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 366.321 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro M5000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GP107GL | GM204 |
| Launch date | 5 July 2017 | 18 August 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 461 | 463 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 1051 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1,536 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,995 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 93.6 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4096 MB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
ATIFireGL V7200
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
ATIFireGL V5200
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R7 A265
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 285
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5000M
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470X
