NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 350

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M5000M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 350

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 77% higher core clock speed: 975 MHz vs 550 MHz
42.5x more texture fill rate: 93.6 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
64x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 128 MB
6.2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 810 MHz
81.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7012 vs 86
Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 471 vs 378

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 August 2015 vs 20 April 2006
Core clock speed	975 MHz vs 550 MHz
Texture fill rate	93.6 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 90 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 128 MB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 810 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7012 vs 86
PassMark - G2D Mark	471 vs 378

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 350

4.8x lower typical power consumption: 21 Watt vs 100 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	21 Watt vs 100 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 350

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7012

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

471

378

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M5000M	NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
PassMark - G3D Mark	7012	86
PassMark - G2D Mark	471	378
Geekbench - OpenCL	22785
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	95.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1341.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	83.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	366.321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3339
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M5000M	NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Curie
Code name	GM204	G72
Launch date	18 August 2015	20 April 2006
Place in performance rating	455	453
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1051 MHz
Core clock speed	975 MHz	550 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,995 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	90 nm
Pipelines	1,536
Texture fill rate	93.6 GTexel / s	2.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	21 Watt
Transistor count	5,200 million	112 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x VGA
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		168 mm
API support
DirectX	12	9.0c
OpenGL	4.5	2.1
Shader Model	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	128 MB
Memory bandwidth	160 GB / s	6.48 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	810 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR2
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus