NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile and ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 98% higher core clock speed: 1041 MHz vs 525 MHz
7.9x more texture fill rate: 16.66 GTexel / s vs 2.1 GTexel / s
9.6x more pipelines: 384 vs 40
19x better floating-point performance: 799.5 gflops vs 42 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
6.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 800 MHz
16.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1891 vs 114
7.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3011 vs 426
7.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3011 vs 426

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	11 January 2017 vs 28 June 2007
Core clock speed	1041 MHz vs 525 MHz
Texture fill rate	16.66 GTexel / s vs 2.1 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 40
Floating-point performance	799.5 gflops vs 42 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1891 vs 114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3011 vs 426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3011 vs 426

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 25 Watt
Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 346 vs 226

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	20 Watt vs 25 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	346 vs 226

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

226

346

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1891

114

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3011

426

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3011

426

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile	ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
PassMark - G2D Mark	226	346
PassMark - G3D Mark	1891	114
Geekbench - OpenCL	6206
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3079
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1692
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1692
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3011	426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3011	426

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile	ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale
Code name	GM108	RV610
Launch date	11 January 2017	28 June 2007
Place in performance rating	959	956
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Core clock speed	1041 MHz	525 MHz
Floating-point performance	799.5 gflops	42 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	384	40
Texture fill rate	16.66 GTexel / s	2.1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	20 Watt
Transistor count		180 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB / s	6.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR2