NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro K620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K620

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 41 Watt
2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3079 vs 2970
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3079 vs 2970

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	11 January 2017 vs 22 July 2014
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 41 Watt
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3079 vs 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3079 vs 2970

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620

Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 1041 MHz
Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 16.66 GTexel / s
Around 8% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 799.5 gflops
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 478 vs 225
Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2225 vs 1884
Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 vs 6206
Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 vs 1692
Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 vs 1692
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 3011
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 3011

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1058 MHz vs 1041 MHz
Texture fill rate	17.98 GTexel / s vs 16.66 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	863.2 gflops vs 799.5 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	478 vs 225
PassMark - G3D Mark	2225 vs 1884
Geekbench - OpenCL	6869 vs 6206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2490 vs 1692
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2490 vs 1692
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329 vs 3011
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329 vs 3011

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

225

478

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1884

2225

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

6206

6869

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3079

2970

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3079

2970

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1692

2490

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1692

2490

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3011

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3011

3329

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro K620
PassMark - G2D Mark	225	478
PassMark - G3D Mark	1884	2225
Geekbench - OpenCL	6206	6869
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3079	2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3079	2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1692	2490
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1692	2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3011	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3011	3329
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		22.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		297.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		15.363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		99.125
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		702

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro K620
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Code name	GM108	GM107
Launch date	11 January 2017	22 July 2014
Place in performance rating	959	961
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$189.89
Price now		$189.93
Value for money (0-100)		15.23
Technical info
Core clock speed	1041 MHz	1058 MHz
Floating-point performance	799.5 gflops	863.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	384
Texture fill rate	16.66 GTexel / s	17.98 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	41 Watt
Boost clock speed		1124 MHz
Transistor count		1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		160 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management