NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce 840A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce 840A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1041 MHz vs 1029 MHz
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 33 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2002 MHz
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1870 vs 1180
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6338 vs 5596
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3079 vs 2188
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3079 vs 2188
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 17 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1041 MHz vs 1029 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 2002 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1870 vs 1180 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6338 vs 5596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3079 vs 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3079 vs 2188 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840A
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 16.66 GTexel / s
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 799.5 gflops
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 266 vs 227
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2314 vs 1692
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2314 vs 1692
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3117 vs 3011
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3117 vs 3011
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s vs 16.66 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 799.5 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 266 vs 227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2314 vs 1692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2314 vs 1692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3117 vs 3011 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3117 vs 3011 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840A
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce 840A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 227 | 266 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1870 | 1180 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6338 | 5596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3079 | 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3079 | 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1692 | 2314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1692 | 2314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3011 | 3117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3011 | 3117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce 840A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Code name | GM108 | GM108 |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 17 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 951 | 954 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1041 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 799.5 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 16.66 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 33 Watt |
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 16.02 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2002 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |