NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 988 MHz vs 384
- 7.8x more texture fill rate: 285.2 GTexel / s vs 36.8 billion / sec
- 8x more pipelines: 3072 vs 384
- 7.7x better floating-point performance: 6,844 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11869 vs 2360
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 695 vs 479
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 March 2016 vs 5 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 988 MHz vs 384 |
Texture fill rate | 285.2 GTexel / s vs 36.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops vs 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11869 vs 2360 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 695 vs 479 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11869 | 2360 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 695 | 479 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39431 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13107 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13107 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GM200 | GF104 |
Launch date | 5 March 2016 | 5 January 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4,999 | |
Place in performance rating | 233 | 255 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1114 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 988 MHz | 384 |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 3072 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 285.2 GTexel / s | 36.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,000 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 317.4 GB / s | 96.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |