NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 988 MHz
  • Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1114 MHz
  • Around 20% better floating-point performance: 8,186 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 21% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6612 MHz
  • Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14685 vs 11869
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 vs 695
  • Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51484 vs 39431
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 13107
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 13107
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 November 2017 vs 5 March 2016
Core clock speed 1607 MHz vs 988 MHz
Boost clock speed 1683 MHz vs 1114 MHz
Floating-point performance 8,186 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed 8008 MHz vs 6612 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 14685 vs 11869
PassMark - G2D Mark 876 vs 695
Geekbench - OpenCL 51484 vs 39431
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16128 vs 13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16128 vs 13107

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

  • Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 285.2 GTexel / s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
  • Around 26% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2432
  • 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3638
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3638
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 285.2 GTexel / s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 3072 vs 2432
Maximum memory size 24 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 3638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 vs 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 3638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 vs 3344

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
14685
11869
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
876
695
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
51484
39431
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16128
13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3638
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3344
3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16128
13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3638
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3344
3354
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark 14685 11869
PassMark - G2D Mark 876 695
Geekbench - OpenCL 51484 39431
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 182.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1797.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 14.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 26.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1035.984
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16128 13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3638 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3344 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16128 13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3638 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3344 3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 6809

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Maxwell 2.0
Code name GP104 GM200
Launch date 2 November 2017 5 March 2016
Launch price (MSRP) $399 $4,999
Place in performance rating 235 233
Price now $379.99
Type Desktop Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 44.74

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1683 MHz 1114 MHz
Core clock speed 1607 MHz 988 MHz
Floating-point performance 8,186 gflops 6,844 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 2432 3072
Texture fill rate 255.8 GTexel / s 285.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 180 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 7,200 million 8,000 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Memory bandwidth 256.3 GB / s 317.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 8008 MHz 6612 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready