NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 988 MHz
- Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- Around 20% better floating-point performance: 8,186 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 21% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6612 MHz
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14695 vs 11872
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 875 vs 691
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55377 vs 40181
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 13107
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 13107
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 November 2017 vs 5 March 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 988 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops vs 6,844 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 6612 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14695 vs 11872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 vs 691 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55377 vs 40181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 vs 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 vs 13107 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 285.2 GTexel / s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- Around 26% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2432
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3638
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3638
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 285.2 GTexel / s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2432 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3344 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14695 | 11872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 | 691 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55377 | 40181 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 | 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3638 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 | 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3638 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6812 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP104 | GM200 |
Launch date | 2 November 2017 | 5 March 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $4,999 |
Place in performance rating | 242 | 239 |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 988 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | 6,844 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2432 | 3072 |
Texture fill rate | 255.8 GTexel / s | 285.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 8,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.3 GB / s | 317.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 6612 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |