NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- 696.7x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 6612 MHz
- Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64033 vs 40181
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 13107
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 13107
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 5 March 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 6612 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64033 vs 40181 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 vs 13107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 vs 13107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 988 MHz vs 945 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- 4x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 691 vs 510
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11872 vs 11109
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 988 MHz vs 945 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 691 vs 510 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11872 vs 11109 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 510 | 691 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11109 | 11872 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64033 | 40181 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 13107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 13107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N19E-Q1 | GM200 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 5 March 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 241 | 239 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,999 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1114 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 945 MHz | 988 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 285.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10800 million | 8,000 million |
| Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | Large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 317.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 6612 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
