NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs Intel HD Graphics 2000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M600M and Intel HD Graphics 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 64x more pipelines: 384 vs 6
- 84.6x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 10.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2151 vs 213
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1039
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1039
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 5 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 6 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 10.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2151 vs 213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 1039 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2000
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1124 MHz
- 47.3x more texture fill rate: 850 MTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 349
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1124 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 850 MTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 vs 349 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M600M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 2000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M600M | Intel HD Graphics 2000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2151 | 213 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 | 456 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 1039 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M600M | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 6.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Sandy Bridge GT1 |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 5 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 680 | 683 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 10.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 6 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 850 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.1 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |