NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 720 MHz
- 4.1x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 122 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 3571
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 3571
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3336
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3336
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 23 October 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 720 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 122 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 vs 3571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 vs 3571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
- 5.1x more texture fill rate: 92.2 billion / sec vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 384
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3593 vs 2171
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 440 vs 337
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12225 vs 5983
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5683 vs 2945
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5683 vs 2945
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 384 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3593 vs 2171 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 440 vs 337 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12225 vs 5983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5683 vs 2945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5683 vs 2945 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2171 | 3593 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 337 | 440 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5983 | 12225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2945 | 5683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2945 | 5683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 | 3571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 | 3571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3336 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.421 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 734.936 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.31 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.434 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 56.706 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM107 | |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 23 October 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 698 | 701 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 92.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3540 Million |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 160 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro M600M with others
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
ATIRadeon X700
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680MX
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
AMDFirePro D500
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4200
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop)
