NVIDIA Quadro M600M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro M600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M600M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 43% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 720 MHz
- 4.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 122 Watt
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 2500 MHz
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 versus 3571
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 versus 3571
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3336
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3336
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 versus 23 October 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 720 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 122 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 2500 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 versus 3571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 versus 3571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3336 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 92.2 billion / sec versus 17.98 GTexel / s
- 4x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 384
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3593 versus 2171
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 440 versus 337
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12225 versus 5983
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5683 versus 2945
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5683 versus 2945
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 92.2 billion / sec versus 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 384 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3593 versus 2171 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 440 versus 337 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12225 versus 5983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5683 versus 2945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5683 versus 2945 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro M600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2171 | 3593 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 337 | 440 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5983 | 12225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2945 | 5683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2945 | 5683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 | 3571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 | 3571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.421 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 734.936 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.31 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.434 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 56.706 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro M600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM107 | |
Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 | 23 October 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 698 | 701 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz | 720 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s | 92.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 122 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3540 Million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Taille du laptop | large | large |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | 160 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |