NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 454.5x better floating-point performance: 1,000 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 70 Watt
- 33.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3854 vs 115.4
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 8 August 2016 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 70 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3854 vs 115.4 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 756 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 977 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 67.2 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 896 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 575 vs 415
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4102 vs 2795
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17433 vs 7954
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6821 vs 3854
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 756 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 977 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 67.2 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 512 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 575 vs 415 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4102 vs 2795 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17433 vs 7954 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6821 vs 3854 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 415 | 575 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2795 | 4102 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7954 | 17433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3854 | 6821 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3854 | 115.4 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.048 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 969.655 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.655 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.807 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 239.111 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1728 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Baffin |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 8 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 569 | 570 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | |
Price now | $179.50 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 33.86 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 977 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 756 MHz | 1090 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,000 gflops | 2.2 TFLOPs |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 896 |
Texture fill rate | 31.26 GTexel / s | 67.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 70 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
Compute units | 14 | |
GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
Stream Processors | 896 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Length | 170 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 112 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0 | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |